Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: BJ Penn Says He's Not Interested in Fighting Josh Koscheck

A Draft is a Type of Beer: The Case Against the MLS SuperDraft

"Hey Gershon, did you ever need to be drafted?" "No, Matt my friend...the only draft I've ever heard of was a beer." (Photo by Abelimages/Getty Images)

As we get closer and closer to the annual MLS SuperDraft, it bamboozles me that every year it still survives. As a product that rose from the ashes of two defunct drafts, the draft survives as a way for teams to reload for the future -- like almost all other North American sport, it is a way for college stars to become professional heroes...or so that's the case, anyway.

I know I am not the first writer to spill ink calling for the abolition of the Superdraft, nor will I be the last. And I will be the first to admit that Toronto FC hasn't exactly had the best draft record. But with the growth of our own academy and the fruit that is soon to ripen from that tree, isn't it time we stopped the charade?

While the draft may be an integral part of other pro sports in North America, soccer is a different animal in how it grows its talent -- European leagues have not needed drafts, and it's time that MLS followed suit.

Star-divide

Most people who follow American sports know that the draft is a way for a pro sports team to rebuild after one or several losing seasons -- drawing from the ranks of college athletes, fresh out of university (or sometimes just halfway through). College football has fed into the NFL, while college basketball feeds into the NBA. In Europe -- where MLS seems to be drawing most of its top talent -- college and university sport does not have the same sway, as they are more focused on academia, rather than making sport into a cash cow.

In this rush to create said cash cow in the U.S. college system, where does that leave the quality of the game? For one -- NCAA matches do not follow standard FIFA rules, one of which is the golden goal rule (which was abandoned in the international game in 2004). Other rules include unlimited substitutions, and clock-stoppages -- all of which are not employed in the international game, and probably will not be implemented in the near future.

That alone begs the question -- if the NCAA is supposedly the way that players are being brought up for future MLS and international glory, then why isn't the college game played the way the rest of the world plays it? While most players have adapted once they enter MLS, you cannot say that it does not affect the development of the players' "footballing brain". And yet, we are looking for those coming out of such a flawed system to be the future heroes of MLS?

This gap in talent is most likely why most of the players that MLS teams and supporters most look forward to, do not hail from North America -- just take a look at the list of Designated Players, and even the lone American on the list currently did not hone his skills at a college, but at the IMG Academy in Florida -- and look how he turned out. When was the last time you heard someone who had left the U.S. college ranks, and had made a big name for themselves? (Clint Dempsey does not count...)

There is a huge debate that is going on right now in U.S. soccer, and there is recognition that the status quo does not work, and that MLS teams, in following the examples of the rest of the world by developing their own academy systems, is the way to go. One doesn't have to go far to see some of the success stories: Juan Agudelo, Andy Najar (whose rise was documented by this wonderful ESPN piece) and Ashtone Morgan are a few of the names that are slowly making their way to the top.

The likes of Agudelo, Najar and Morgan are products of proper scouting, and careful development which has resulted in them playing first team football with the senior teams, while winning plaudits from their peers and attention from other parts of the world. It's a slow process, but these successes aren't being ignored -- almost every MLS squad has an academy of their own, and the return of the Reserve League this past season is perhaps the best example of MLS teams' push to raise their own players, rather than rely on the U.S. college system and the SuperDraft.

Sure, drafts work for most other sports -- but those sports do not have an international outlook like footy does. And until we fully realize that in order for the U.S.A. and eventually, hopefully, Canada to someday be competitive at events like the World Cup, and to take our places amongst the pantheon of footballing nations, we cannot afford to rely any further on a North American sporting anachronism. It wouldn't hurt if the NCAA were to pick up their game, too...

And if you still have any doubts...here's some more names to think of: Matt Gold, Zac Herold, Mike Zaher and Julius James...amongst other gems. Got the picture? Good.)

The college game will stay, but it's time that MLS stopped making it so easy for mediocre college talent to clog up MLS rosters, and let the true stars shine. Like the old saying goes, "give a football team a fish, they will compete for the day. But if you teach them how to fish, they can compete forever." -- and it's time MLS stopped giving out fish, and abolish the SuperDraft.

And for the love of all things sacred and holy, why is it "Super" anyway?!

Poll
The MLS Superdraft is...
...an outdated relic of the MLS's past, and should be abandoned.
23 votes
...part of a time-honoured tradition in North American sport, and should be kept.
18 votes
...something that I wouldn't give a rat's arse about.
10 votes
...still around?
2 votes

53 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 34 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I voted for abolish, but i don’t quite think we’re there yet, it’s still got it;‘s uses for now, but should be on it’s way out really.

Managing editor of SBNation's Toronto FC blog,Waking the Red .

by Duncan Fletcher on Dec 30, 2011 11:54 AM EST reply actions  

A college degree is worth significantly more than a year or two in MLS (which is what most of these players get at the most anyway). A college scholarship for soccer has an even higher value. Until that dramatically changes, many top prospects will pick college soccer every time. If you want to talk about abolishing the draft, you have to talk about the economics behind it.

There’s also nothing stopping MLS from signing any of these talented kids to contracts before they go to college. There’s nothing stopping an entire world of clubs from saving these kids from allegedly stunting their growth. In fact the college game helps many players who need more time to develop before they can contribute. If you don’t like the system, you should be encouraging TFC to sign all those youngsters that just need the help of a professional organization apparently.

That gives too much credit to organizations at this point too because you are suggesting a player like Andy Najar who moved here when he was 13 and worked with DC for a year or two suddenly had D.C. unlock his potential. Najar is who he is primarily because of his talent, not because D.C.’s academy built him into a superplayer.

The college system isn’t even a necessary evil, it’s a positive contribution to MLS because MLS doesn’t have to invest a single dollar into the program but they reap the rewards year in and year out with talented players. Even if more and more players continue to go through academies, the SuperDraft is going to be here for a very long time. If they’ll put up with the results from the Re-Entry Draft, they will put up with only a couple of players worth while coming from the SuperDraft. You even have internationals like your own Plata that came through the SuperDraft.

You have to look at it as just another way to acquire players in MLS. It certainly isn’t the pipeline of the only talent in the league the way it is for the NFL and the NBA.

Hot Time In Old Town SB Nation's blog for Chicago Fire, Soccer, & Chicago History

by Tweed Thornton on Dec 30, 2011 12:32 PM EST reply actions  

The draft is not going anywhere and that is a fact. The league has done well to reduce the size of the draft and promote the development of academies but that is all they are going to do. As Tweed pointed out above there is a huge matter of economics when it comes to the draft and getting rid of it all together would completely burn the bridge between the league and the NCAA and that can not happen.

Try and look at it from the perspective of a parent who has a talented young player and is considering the options for their development. When the player is around 14 or 15 you can almost never know for sure that they will reach the professional level so going for broke in that regard is generally a foolish risk. So now you have the option to enroll them in the academy which gives them a chance to develop and go pro one day but the key reason this move makes sense is that all MLS academies are capable of working with the players to send them to college if they are not ready to make the jump to the next level. If that option is lost and players who go to the academy no longer get scholarships and chances to play in the NCAA then many parents would not be as willing to enroll their child in the academy. As a parent and as a player it is key to have backup options which the current setup provides.

Now if you get rid of the draft you damage that relationship and players who are not good enough for the league end up being stuck with much fewer options. Going to play in the NCAA needs to remain an option because again Tweed nails it by saying an education is worth a whole lot more then a couple MLS seasons at league minimum salary.

So the draft is not going anywhere no matter how little talent might come through it. On top of that one could argue that almost every draft class still produces in the range of 10 players who are talented enough to be MLS contributors. The league is a long ways from being at the stage where the academies pick up all of the talent in the country so some players will slip through unnoticed and end up being found by a college instead.

If the MLS wants to keep improving the NCAA needs to be a part of that as the league needs to take advantage of all of the sources of talent at its disposal.

Writer for Toronto FC blog Waking The Red
http://wakingthered.com/

by Dave Rowaan on Dec 30, 2011 12:46 PM EST up reply actions  

But doesn’t the way that it is right now encourage mediocrity? I deffo see your point but with the college game in the way it is, it’s not exactly growing the game or getting the USA closer to their dream of a World Cup…

by John Leung on Dec 30, 2011 5:18 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Ideally none of the top players go to college and play but most players in the academy need a backup plan and that is going to school and getting a degree. Draft is key to keeping a good relationship between clubs and schools

Writer for Toronto FC blog Waking The Red
http://wakingthered.com/

by Dave Rowaan on Dec 30, 2011 5:25 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

There has to be a way to balance that — academies can make it so that players are required to take college courses while they are playing.

by John Leung on Dec 30, 2011 6:19 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

But then they need a relationship with the colleges and right now the draft is key to that.

Writer for Toronto FC blog Waking The Red
http://wakingthered.com/

by Dave Rowaan on Dec 30, 2011 7:04 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I’m going to invoke Stumptown Footy’s Ryan Gates’ article on the issue here: http://www.stumptownfooty.com/2011/12/28/2665401/is-college-soccer-good-for-mls

Barring a major shakeup of NCAA footy, it cannot be relied upon for the future…maybe going to an academy system will be the wakeup call it needs. But maybe I’m again living in a land of sugarpops and bacondoodles…?

by John Leung on Dec 30, 2011 8:23 PM EST up reply actions  

If I have not been totally clear I think that for producing talent the NCAA is not going to be important going forwards. They want to shorten the season even more and that will hurt development. The relationship is what I strongly feel needs to be preserved for the future of academy players who just don’t have it to turn pro at 18

Writer for Toronto FC blog Waking The Red
http://wakingthered.com/

by Dave Rowaan on Dec 30, 2011 8:50 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

If we are keeping the draft for the relationship’s sake…I have a hard time seeing that as an incentive for NCAA to change its stripes. Reducing it seems to be read as negative reinforcement already (with the season being shortened) — if we have to keep it up as a charade just-in-case some gem comes through, then I could accept it…but I still wouldn’t like it.

by John Leung on Dec 30, 2011 9:22 PM EST up reply actions  

mmmmmm

bacon

Managing editor of SBNation's Toronto FC blog,Waking the Red .

by Duncan Fletcher on Dec 31, 2011 1:19 AM EST up reply actions  

Got a case of smoked pork on the brain there, boss? :)

by John Leung on Dec 31, 2011 7:20 AM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

I was drunk and in no shape to be responding to anything more than the mention of bacon.

these bacondoodles you speak of sound intriguing.

Managing editor of SBNation's Toronto FC blog,Waking the Red .

by Duncan Fletcher on Dec 31, 2011 1:12 PM EST up reply actions  

If TFC wins the MLS Cup, I’ll make ya some. :)

by John Leung on Dec 31, 2011 3:59 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

The fact that it had been the de facto way to fill rosters has certainly given the draft an advantage, but I am of the opinion that a shift in the way MLS fills its rosters is required — if 9 times out of 10 the league is getting the pips of the lemon instead of juice for lemonade…maybe it’s a time for the league to look at things a little differently!

by John Leung on Dec 30, 2011 5:10 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

If we're talking "where is MLS in 20 years"...

I could see how there’s no SuperDraft. But this is also a world with free agency and no single-entity. Yeah, the SuperDraft is kinda clunky and seems out of place in the soccer world, but it still produces the bulk of MLS’s talent. Until academies start producing legitimate contributors on a regular basis, the point is kinda moot.

Editor/writer at Sounder at Heart, MLS editor SB Nation. Follow me on Twitter. You'll Never Yacht Alone.

by Jeremiah Oshan on Dec 30, 2011 12:49 PM EST reply actions  

My point is thats the way MLS needs to go — they need to start to develop their own talent instead of relying on the flawed NCAA system, which by and large isn’t always about academics!

by John Leung on Dec 30, 2011 4:24 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

There should be a 5th option – bang in the middle….namely, the draft is a useful tool to help build a roster. No, it’s not the only avenue, but it is established and has produced a LOT of MNT players that you conveniently leave out.

Draft picks don’t ‘clog’ any rosters – you’re not obligated to use any of the picks. If you can find a good player who can contribute, more so the better, if not, what is the harm? Trade your picks for players, cash or slots….work the system.

Is the NCAA version of soccer an ideal development ground for MLS or pro soccer? No, not really, but to render every player in the system is nothing short of ignorant.

And really, you want to use ZAc Herold – a kid with a congenital medical condition that prevented him playing for health reasons is in no way a failure of the draft process, he could just as easily come through an academy. After all, he was a top teenage prospect and member of the US YNT.

I could write all day on why I disagree with this post, but I don’t have the time. Suffice to say I completely disagree – the draft has it’s place, as one of many tools available to teams to help build competitive squads. Even within TFC’s history, you’d be dismissing the talent and contribution of players like Stefen Frei, Mo Edu (who was clearly a waste of time as he only brought in $5m!) not to mention many other of our picks plying their trade around the league.

by Alan Clark on Dec 30, 2011 12:50 PM EST reply actions  

Frei and Edu came in when academy development in MLS wasn’t en vogue yet — and when there is examples like Agudelo and Stinson (academy grads) out there, it’s not hard to see why the draft should have a second examination at the very least.

by John Leung on Dec 30, 2011 5:14 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Stinson’s a good example of a way forward, at TFC academy, went to college, did well for a year, tried out again and was good enough to get a first team contract, but still avoided the draft.
That sort of working together can be a good bridge between NCAA reliance and academy reliance.

Managing editor of SBNation's Toronto FC blog,Waking the Red .

by Duncan Fletcher on Dec 30, 2011 5:19 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

In a perfect happy world filled with sunshine and lollipops, that would be the way things would go — but reality dictates one will ultimately win out in the end, to the marginalization of the other. But I do like the Stinson way.

by John Leung on Dec 30, 2011 8:14 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

List of some USMNT players who plays at a decent European club with NCAA background
Carlos Bocanegra
Oguchi Onyewu
Maurice Edu
Sacha Kljestan
Stuart Holden

by Yohan027 on Dec 30, 2011 1:48 PM EST reply actions  

Keller

McBride

Or MLS players like Bunbury, Zakuani, Nagbe, Kitchen, Frei

I am not a Supporter | I am not a Fan | I am a Sounder
Sounder At Heart Dave's Twitter

by Dave Clark on Dec 30, 2011 4:24 PM EST up reply actions  

The major reason that list is possible is because that the NCAA has had a massive headstart in re-stocking MLS lineups — but none of them have really lit up the world just yet. Agudelo and Altidore, albeit brief, have.

It’s only recently that Clint Dempsey has started to light things up for Fulham — and he’s no spring chicken!

by John Leung on Dec 30, 2011 8:26 PM EST up reply actions  

ideally, the league would be at a point where they don’t need the ncaa, but that’s probably a while off yet. Until then, it’s a useful way to fill out a squad, and maybe, occasionally get a high level player.

does it hurt the players? yes and no. I imagine there’s some players who could have ended up better if in a more football intensive programme for those years, but there’s probably some who would have fallen completely through the cracks, and really it’s a very small percentage who’ll make a good living out of football, so the degree is probably the smart choice for most of them.

anyway, don’t have the time right now to say much more than that, so I’ll just hang out here on my comfy comfy fence.

Managing editor of SBNation's Toronto FC blog,Waking the Red .

by Duncan Fletcher on Dec 30, 2011 2:30 PM EST reply actions  

Agreed — I am not against having a happy medium. But the track record for the NCAA in my eyes is viewed very dimly. With how I’ve seen college football has become this gigantic money maker for universities (and how soccer is being squeezed out, according to Stumptown Footy’s Ryan Gates, because of it) — I can’t see the NCAA changing its stripes.

by John Leung on Dec 30, 2011 8:36 PM EST up reply actions  

The move to get rid of spring games is a huge blow to every program. To me the idea of going to play in the NCAA would now only make sense if I knew I had a stable club situation to get playing time in the 8 months between NCAA seasons.

Writer for Toronto FC blog Waking The Red
http://wakingthered.com/

by Dave Rowaan on Dec 30, 2011 8:53 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Like I said above — I think the NCAA is seeing the reduction of the draft as “the MLS wants to play it like that, huh? Well…we’ll just cut our losses and forget it.”

I’m sure I’m not the only one that sees it that way…?

by John Leung on Dec 30, 2011 9:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Most schools see it as an issue of dollars and cents really. The money comes in from basketball and football so why invest heavily in a soccer program and more scholarships since you don’t see any profit from it. I don’t think the NCAA actually cares all that much about changes made to the draft since at the end of the day its not like the league pays them any kind of bonus for producing talent.

Writer for Toronto FC blog Waking The Red
http://wakingthered.com/

by Dave Rowaan on Dec 30, 2011 9:32 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

…and honestly, I don’t see why the league should pay. Does the NCAA ask the NFL to pay? I don’t think so.

So I don’t see why MLS needs to accept watered down products. If someone waters down beer at BMO, I doubt you’d want to pay $9 for it! :)

by John Leung on Dec 30, 2011 10:07 PM EST up reply actions  

I have never bought a beer at BMO and that will never change. I can not pay that kind of money for a drink.

Also, I am not suggesting the league should pay royalties to the NCAA as the natural progression is that the NCAA loses its top talent to the MLS. No players final goal is to play at the college level so if they have the chance to go pro they will take it. What I am saying is that it is a bit much to suggest that the NCAA makes it decisions based on what the MLS does. They are more focused on what is best for them and at the end of the day keeping soccer as a small time sport even at the division 1 level just makes good financial sense for them since it is not going to be a big ticket item. They realize that even though cutting back on soccer means some programs are folding it still makes more sense then schools pumping money in to programs that generate no return.

Writer for Toronto FC blog Waking The Red
http://wakingthered.com/

by Dave Rowaan on Dec 30, 2011 10:25 PM EST up reply actions  

But that brings us back to the issue of using the NCAA to develop players — if dollars and cents are what they are looking at, ultimately wouldn’t the cuts they move now affect what they are able to present to MLS, which ultimately could lead to further eroding of the player trail from NCAA to MLS?

That’s what I’m really concerned about. If this is what the NCAA is doing, then why should the MLS continue to accept an increasingly worsening product when they are aiming for numero uno? It’s incongruent, I tells ya! Incongruence!!!!

(There — I said it, I used the word incongruent! That’s the word of the day!!!! )

by John Leung on Dec 31, 2011 5:33 AM EST up reply actions  

I feel we are making two very different points here. You are suggesting get rid of the draft because the talent is not good enough coming from the NCAA and the relationship is not something the league needs to be concerned with. I am suggesting that even though the amount of quality talent from NCAA programs is only going to continue to decrease going forwards the league needs to keep the draft to ensure the relationship remains strong for the sake of every academy kid that is not good enough to make the league.

Writer for Toronto FC blog Waking The Red
http://wakingthered.com/

by Dave Rowaan on Dec 31, 2011 8:35 AM EST up reply actions  

I believe you have nailed it on the head, sir…but I do see your point, since academy kids do need a backup. I was thinking that while academy kids are at the Academy, they are also at post-secondary…

by John Leung on Dec 31, 2011 4:02 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Waking the Red is a blog about Major League Soccer's Toronto FC, as well as occasional bits about other MLS and Canadian football. Match previews, reports, opinion, bias and plenty of MLSE related cynicism, get it all here.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Wakingthered-xl_small
Send a kid to Canada v Honduras.
Rsz_imag0005_small
Canada World Cup Qualifying Tickets on Sale!
Rsz_imag0005_small
Support World Vision

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

Wakingthered-xl_small Duncan Fletcher

Writer Extraordinaire

Rsz_imag0005_small Dave Rowaan

572651_100001742112964_1959490619_n_small John Leung