Tam Nsaliwa Ripping Canada
Before we go anywhere with this post take a minute and read the latest blog from former Canadian International Tam Nsaliwa here.
Now that you have read his rant, I feel that it is certainly something worth drawing some further attention to. He raises a number of points that many of us will have a very strong reaction to. It is his main point though, a very strong critique of Canada, that has the most value for us. It has value because he is right. For soccer to reach another level in Canada the end result has to become all that matters. As fans we would just be lying to ourselves if we actually said we would rather have a team with squeaky clean track records than make the World Cup. The fact of the matter is that to an individual we would all be willing to overlook character flaws in any of the National team players if that player was helping Canada find success.
So why does Tam even feel the need to make this case even though a number of years ago he renounced his Canadian citizenship? Well, it may have something to do with the fact that he only ever received 13 caps for Canada despite playing at some very strong clubs in Europe including AEK Athens. Tam was forced to the fringe of the Canadian squad by former managers, including Paul James, and in the end when forced to choose international games over club games, he made the choice to give up his Canadian citizenship so that he could have an easier time getting work in the EU. Nsaliwa is not necessarily a player who deserted Canada, but instead is a player who may feel that in some ways Canada deserted him.
So that is where I personally feel his blogged rant is coming from. It is coming from a player who spent many years dealing with a level of frustration that Canadian managers saw perceived character issues with him, and that kept him away from the national team. The issue of whether or not he was a talented enough defensive midfielder to consistently get calls to Canada when the likes of Julian De Guzman and Patrice Bernier were already in the squad is not relevant to this at all. It makes no difference to his point that Canada has been putting winning second, or even lower, for far to long.
When you get past all the asides that his blog goes on and the discussion of players who have nothing to do with Canada you get to him making a point that we can't afford to ignore. You get to a question that I think we all need to ask ourselves. Is winning the most important thing, or for that matter is it the only thing that matters when it comes to professional sports? Or, can we as fans, players, and coaches in this country afford to put character over results?
It is certainly a hard question to answer. Ideally we could all be like Barcelona and have several players who are at the top of the world in terms of talent and avoid the negative attention that follows so many of their peers. We don't live in an ideal world. We live in Canada, a country that struggles to get results more often than not and far too often we end up crying foul when we feel that we have been done wrong. Is there a way for Canada to put winning first and still be a team of players that the next generation can look up to? Of course there is, just like a kid in England can still look up to Wayne Rooney. No matter the character of a player off the field what is going to matter at the end of the day is what they do on the field and how many games they help that team win.
That is the point I take away from Nsaliwa's blog and it is a point that is very important. Much more important then a lot of what mr. James had to say about players like Tam in "Cracked Open".
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
a lot of interesting points there.
agree that MLS does lack some of the carrots and sticks needed to develop that ruthless edge in players.
agree that Suarez’s handball in the world cup was a magnificent play that needed to be done, and as much as I hate diving, I’d never turn down a penalty that clearly wasn’t.
agree that what players do in their private lives shouldn’t matter a bit as long as they can keep playing at the same level, and aren’t fucking over their teammates, ie john terry with wayne bridge.
But at the same time, players do have to fit into a team structure, and if an individual player’s ego is bringing the team as a whole down, then yes, bench him, kick him off the team, whatever you have to do. Just like individual players, Coaches such as Paul James should also be doing every little thing they can to give their team the advantage, even if it is just to advance their career or make money. Sometimes a coaches ruthless single minded plan for winning is going to differ from a players ruthless single minded plan.
At a professional level, a coach absolutely shouldn’t be making decisions based on character and morality and being a good example. it should all be just about winning and doing what’s best for the team, which might mean getting rid of a selfish or disruptive player.
I think that’s really what a lot of this sort of conflict comes down to. both sides are simply doing what they think is necessary to win, but they just have different ideas on what’s important for that.
Managing editor of SBNation's Toronto FC blog,Waking the Red .
by Duncan Fletcher on Feb 19, 2012 11:30 PM EST reply actions
I’d be curious to hear what Jason de Vos, Paul Stalteri, Craig Forrest, all high character guys who have achieved much more in their professional careers than Tam or Ali Gerba, have to say about Tam’s thoughts. I think their feelings might be quite a bit different, or maybe not, who knows.
maybe that’s one of the reasons de vos and forrest haven’t tried to go into pro coaching after their careers, they don’t want to have to deal with the ego wrangling necessary. pure conjecture on my part there.
It’s all about balance really, yes talent is very important, but so’s discipline and a team coming together to be more than the sum of it’s parts. how much do you let people get away with because they’re geniuses who can help you out if they’re happy, and when do you crack down. some coaches will go too far, some won’t go far enough, very few will be able to find that balance and maintain it for more than a year or two.
he mentions balotelli, presumably suggesting mancini’s been more helpful to him that Mourinho was, yet mancini’s the one who’s had tevez sitting around doing bugger all for a few months while city have started to struggle, what does he make of that?
Managing editor of SBNation's Toronto FC blog,Waking the Red .
by Duncan Fletcher on Feb 20, 2012 9:04 AM EST up reply actions
Would I want TFC playing more like the Philly Flyers under Freddy Shero?
No way.
When they played the soviets in the mid 70’s who refused to come out for 11 minutes, I applauded the Central Red Army.
Do I expect players to be choirboys off the field? No. I don’t care if Rooney does some Granny, I don’t care if Gerrard gets in a bar fight. But I do care when Cantona went into the stands, when Keane tried to take out Alf-Inge Halande or stamped on Gareth Southgate, when Ronaldo dove in the box, when Rooney lashed out against the Montenegrin, when Beckham tried to kick the argentinean, and the multiple infractions of Suarez.
I care because they are supposed to play within the rules and when they don’t, they get punished. When they get punished, they let their team-mates and the supporters down.
I don’t want to support a team that will do anything to win.
agree, off the pitch stuff, don’t really give a crap, on the pitch, there are rules, there are sunishments for breaking those rules, and you’ve got to weigh up whether it’s worth it to break that rule, risk getting caught and getting the punishment.
Petulant tantrums like cantona, keane, beckham and rooney that you mentioned, they contributed absolutely 0 to the cause, so the punishment outweighed the benefit so yes, stupid moves.
I hate diving, but if ti can win a penalty, or even just a free kick to take the pressure off your team, then that’s a way to benefit the team, and unless it’s a second yellow, the punishment isn’t really that bad if they do get caught. Suarez’ handball, or other ‘professional fouls’ if they can stop a goal or a good chance at goal, that benefit could well outweigh the punishment it will get.
I’m of the mind that a team should be doing anything it can within the rules to win. Even going so far as to deliberately prepare a crappy pitch to try and gain advantage, that sort of thing. Aside from the official rules, there’s also the ‘unwritten codes’ that might come back and bite you if you break them, if every other team hates you, at some point, that’ll work against you.
again, it’s a balancing act between being ‘classy and a team you can be proud of’ but loses, and a ‘dirty cheating’ team that gets some immoral victories. Ideally, your team is good enough that they can play the right way, be as gentlemanly as possible, never try and work the system in your favour and still easily win. If not though, you’ve got to try and take little advantages here and there to even things up.
Managing editor of SBNation's Toronto FC blog,Waking the Red .
by Duncan Fletcher on Feb 20, 2012 11:52 AM EST up reply actions

by 









